Back to rankings

Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP)

Undervalued
HealthcareDiagnostics & ResearchUnited States

Fundamental

68

Price

$618.53

Market Cap

$17.42B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Medpace Holdings is a clinical contract research organization (CRO) based in Cincinnati, Ohio. It runs clinical trials on behalf of pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies that do not have their own trial infrastructure. Its distinguishing choice is a full-service, wholly owned model: rather than subcontracting pieces of a study, Medpace handles feasibility work, study start-up, site selection, patient enrollment support, monitoring, regulatory affairs, data sciences, pharmacovigilance and its own central laboratory and imaging services in-house, across Phase I to Phase IV. The customer base is overwhelmingly small and emerging biopharmaceutical companies: in fiscal 2025, 82% of net revenue came from small biopharmaceutical companies and 13% from mid-sized ones. The company operates internationally but manages itself as a single operating and reportable segment.

How it makes money

Medpace is paid to run studies under contracts that are predominantly fixed-fee: the price is agreed up front for a defined scope of work, and revenue is recognised as the work is performed. This means Medpace, not the sponsor, carries the risk that a study costs more to deliver than it was priced at, and margins depend on estimating and controlling study costs accurately. Alongside service fees, contracts pass through reimbursable out-of-pocket costs such as investigator payments and travel. New business is measured as net awards, and work awarded but not yet performed sits in backlog, which converts into revenue over months to several years. Backlog is not contracted certainty: most customer contracts can be terminated without cause on roughly 30 days' notice, with reimbursement limited to work performed and non-cancellable commitments.

Competitive moat

Switching costs · Narrow

Medpace reports as a single business, and its advantage, such as it is, comes from the awkwardness of changing CRO once a trial is running: the sponsor would have to move regulatory-grade data, retrain sites and investigators, and accept delay in a study whose timeline is the sponsor's main asset. The integrated model reinforces this, because laboratory, imaging and data work sit inside the same contract rather than with separate vendors. The limits are real: clinical research is a fragmented and price-competitive industry, Medpace competes with far larger CROs and with sponsors' own in-house teams, and contracts can be cancelled on short notice, so the advantage attaches to studies already under way rather than to a guaranteed stream of new ones.

What drives demand

Cyclical

Demand comes from the research and development budgets of drug developers and from how much of that work they choose to outsource. Because 82% of Medpace's fiscal 2025 net revenue came from small biopharmaceutical companies, its demand is tied to a customer base that funds itself through equity and venture capital rather than from product cash flow. When biotech funding is plentiful, new studies are started and net awards grow; when capital markets tighten, sponsors delay, downsize or cancel programmes, and because contracts can be terminated on short notice this shows up in cancellations and slower backlog conversion rather than only in fewer new wins. Underlying drug development is a long-cycle activity, which smooths revenue somewhat, but the funding sensitivity makes the order book distinctly cyclical.

Key risks

  • Contracts can be cancelled on short notice, and backlog may not convert — The company discloses that the loss, delay or non-renewal of contracts, or non-payment by customers for services already performed, could hurt results, and that backlog may not convert into revenue at the historical rate or within the expected timeframe. Most contracts are terminable without cause on short notice, so reported backlog is an indication of future work rather than a commitment.
  • Customer and therapeutic-area concentration — Medpace lists concentration among its risk factors: if its business becomes dependent on a limited number of customers or on a small number of therapeutic areas, the loss of one of them, or a setback in that field of research, could have a material adverse effect on the business.
  • Fixed-fee pricing and cost overruns — Because contracts are predominantly fixed-fee, the company warns that underpricing a contract or overrunning its cost estimates would reduce profitability. It also flags that operating margins could fall if pricing pressure increases and it cannot offset this with operating efficiencies or revenue growth ahead of expenses.
  • Dependence on customers' ability to fund their research — The filing identifies risks tied to customers' investment decisions and to the wider industry: reductions in research and development budgets, changes in the trend toward outsourcing clinical development, and consolidation among pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies could all reduce the volume of work available to Medpace.
  • Handling of clinical and personal data — Medpace discloses risks from failures of its information systems and from security breaches affecting the data it holds, as well as from the growing body of personal data protection laws in the jurisdictions where it operates, including its roles as legal representative and data representative for customers.
  • Concentrated control by the founder and related-party dealings — The company flags that its founder and chief executive holds a significant ownership stake and influence over corporate decisions, which may create conflicts of interest with other shareholders, and that it engages in transactions with related parties.
  • Operational execution: sites, investigators and patient enrolment — Delivery depends on recruiting suitable investigators and enrolling patients on schedule, and on third-party vendors used within studies. Difficulties in any of these, or the loss of key personnel, could delay studies and damage results.

Customer concentration

Top customers account for 35.1% of revenue

For fiscal 2025 the company states that no single customer represented 10% or more of net revenue, while approximately 35.1% of net revenue came from its top ten customers. Concentration is therefore moderate and spread across several accounts rather than resting on one sponsor, but it is meaningful enough that the company names customer concentration among its own risk factors.

The case for

Buyers argue that the wholly owned, full-service model gives Medpace tighter control over study timelines and cost than competitors who subcontract, which is what small biotech sponsors — the bulk of its customers — are actually buying, since a delayed trial burns cash they raised for a single programme. They point to the structurally high margins this model has produced, to a customer base too small to build clinical operations in-house and therefore committed to outsourcing, and to the founder-led management that still holds a large stake and has run the company since its origin. They also argue that the concentration in small sponsors is a position few large CROs compete for seriously, and that when biotech funding recovers, net awards and backlog respond quickly.

The case against

Sellers fear the same customer mix from the other side: with 82% of fiscal 2025 net revenue coming from small biopharmaceutical companies, the order book depends on sponsors whose survival depends on raising capital, and a prolonged funding drought turns into cancellations rather than merely fewer awards. They point out that most contracts can be terminated on about 30 days' notice, so backlog can shrink faster than it was built, and that revenue is recognised on fixed-fee contracts where Medpace, not the sponsor, absorbs cost overruns — leaving margins exposed if pricing pressure rises or estimates prove wrong. They also note the risks the company itself discloses around customer and therapeutic-area concentration, competition in a fragmented industry, and the founder's concentrated control together with related-party transactions.

Generated on September 19, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on September 19, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 248.4Score: 55Market cap: $13.42B

Named by Medpace in its own 10-K, ICON is the closest listed pure-play full-service clinical CRO, bidding for the same outsourced Phase I-IV trial programmes from biotech and pharmaceutical sponsors worldwide.

P/E: 33.4Score: 69Market cap: $45.22B

The largest CRO by revenue and the first competitor Medpace names, IQVIA sells the same full-service clinical development contracts to biopharmaceutical sponsors, from trial design through regulatory submission.

P/E: 36.3Score: 68Market cap: $250.91B

Medpace names PPD, now Thermo Fisher's clinical research division, as a major competitor: it runs the same outsourced trials for biopharmaceutical sponsors and is one of the few rivals with comparable global scale.

Fortrea Holdings Inc.FTRE

Spun off from Labcorp in 2023 and listed by Medpace among its major competitors, Fortrea offers the same outsourced clinical trial management and competes hard for small and mid-sized biotech sponsors.

Parexel International CorporationNot tracked

Privately held by EQT and Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Parexel is a global full-service clinical CRO with a long-standing biotech franchise, so it bids against Medpace for the same trial mandates.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$2.78B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$492M

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$682M

Total Equity

$459M

Total Liabilities

$1.52B

Current Ratio

0.73

Interest Coverage

-

Debt/EBITDA

0.24

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

General caseUndervalued

Fair Value

$880.94

Current Price

$618.53

Margin of Safety

+29.8%

Fair Value Range

$572.61 - $1189.27

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$589.92
Discounted cash flow (DCF):$1401.90
Earnings multiple (P/E):$569.99
Graham growth formula:$874.13
Earnings power value (EPV):$150.85
Justified P/B:$212.94
Dividend discount (Gordon):Not enough data to compute it
P/FFO, funds from operations:Not enough data to compute it
Mid-cycle earnings:$341.23
Revenue multiple:$383.90
Analyst Consensus:Hold (7B / 12H / 1S)
Last Earnings Surprise:+4.93%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

36.63

ROE

98.3%

P/B Ratio

40.16

P/FCF

24.65

Gross Margin

-

ROIC

74.1%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC outlier

ROIC

74.1%

WACC

10.6%

ROIC − WACC

+63.5 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (17)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • Price CAGR 32.84%
  • ROIC 74.1%
  • P/FCF 24.65
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 21.0%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 110.1%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 22.3%
  • Earnings Surprise avg 7.5%
  • PEG Ratio 1.11
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.53
  • Share Dilution -7.8%
  • Piotroski F-Score 6/9

Failed (7)

  • P/B Ratio 40.16
  • Current Ratio
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Analyst Consensus 35% Buy
  • Net Margin Trend 17.7% vs 18.7%

Unavailable (3)

  • Gross Margin NaN%
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Interest Coverage

Piotroski F-Score

6/9

Mixed signals: some areas need attention

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.53

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-7.8%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Dr. August James Troendle M.D.CEO, President & Chairman69
Mr. Kevin M. BradyCFO & Treasurer50
Mr. Stephen P. Ewald J.D.Chief Compliance Officer, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary56
Mr. Brad W. HansmanExecutive Vice President of Operations42
Ms. Lauren MorrisAssociate Director of Investors Relations-
Mr. Todd MeyersVice President of Business Development & Marketing-
Mr. Weimin Gai MSSenior Vice President of Biometrics-
Mr. John T. Wynne MBAChief Business Officer-
Ms. Reinilde Heyrman M.D.Chief Medical Officer of Medical Department64
Ms. Gina Leisring M.P.H.Senior Vice President of Clinical Monitoring-

Audit Risk

6

Board Risk

8

Compensation Risk

4

Shareholder Rights Risk

5

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-02-10

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-07-23

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-07-22

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for MEDP, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for MEDP.