Back to rankings

IQVIA Holdings Inc (IQV)

Undervalued
HealthcareDiagnostics & ResearchUnited States

Fundamental

66

Price

$268.85

Market Cap

$44.60B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

IQVIA Holdings is a global provider of outsourced services and data to the life sciences industry. It does two things that used to be separate businesses: it runs clinical trials on behalf of drug and medical-device companies (a contract research organization, or CRO), and it sells healthcare data, analytics and software to the commercial side of those same companies. Its data business rests on prescription, sales and non-identified patient records collected from pharmacies, hospitals and other suppliers worldwide — the 2025 10-K describes real-world data covering roughly 1.2 billion non-identified patient records — which it licenses back as reports, benchmarks and cloud platforms. The company reports about 93,000 employees in more than 100 countries, over 10,000 clients, and says it works with nearly all of the top 100 global pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. In fiscal 2025 it reported revenue of $16,310 million, up 5.9% year over year.

How it makes money

Three ways of getting paid sit side by side. The clinical research business is project work: multi-year trial contracts, billed as milestones and units of work are delivered, which build up a contracted backlog — $32.7 billion at the end of 2025, of which the company expects roughly $8.3 billion to convert into revenue over the following twelve months. That backlog is the closest thing IQVIA has to visibility, but the 10-K is explicit that most contracts can be cancelled on short notice, so it is an order book and not a guarantee. The data and analytics business is closer to a subscription: recurring licences to information offerings and cloud/SaaS platforms, renewed periodically, plus discrete consulting and analytics engagements. The contract sales and medical business is staffing-like — clients pay for sales, nurse and medical-education teams that IQVIA employs and deploys on their behalf. The economics differ sharply: data and software carry higher margins than the labour-intensive trial and field-team work.

Revenue by segment

Research & Development Solutions (R&DS)54.5%

The contract research organization: designing and running clinical trials for pharmaceutical, biotech and medical-device clients, including site monitoring, patient recruitment, decentralised trials, and central laboratory work such as genomic and bioanalytical testing. Roughly 51,000 of the group's employees sit here, and this is where the $32.7 billion contracted backlog is measured. Segment revenue was $8,896 million in fiscal 2025, up 4.3% as reported.

Technology & Analytics Solutions (TAS)40.6%

The information and software business: licensed market-measurement offerings (MIDAS, Analytics Link, Disease Insights), real-world evidence built on non-identified patient records, cloud/SaaS platforms for customer relationship management and commercial performance, and consulting. Customers are the commercial, medical-affairs and market-access functions of life sciences companies, plus payers and providers. Segment revenue was $6,626 million in fiscal 2025, up 7.6% as reported.

Contract Sales & Medical Solutions (CSMS)4.8%

Outsourced field teams: contract sales representatives, market-access specialists, nurse-based patient-support programmes and medical education, staffed by roughly 7,000 IQVIA employees and deployed on behalf of clients. It is the smallest segment, and from 1 January 2026 the company folds it into TAS, which is renamed Commercial Solutions. Segment revenue was $788 million in fiscal 2025, up 9.7% as reported.

Competitive moat

Patents and licences · Narrow

The durable asset is the data estate, not the services. IQVIA has spent decades assembling licences with pharmacies, distributors, hospitals and other suppliers, and the resulting market-measurement and real-world datasets — roughly 1.2 billion non-identified patient records per the 2025 10-K — are the reference currency for how drug sales and treatment patterns are counted in many markets. A newcomer cannot buy that history, and clients who have built forecasting, incentive-compensation and regulatory submissions on top of it do not switch lightly. But this covers only the smaller of the two businesses. The clinical research side, which is the majority of revenue, competes for individual trials against other large CROs and against pharma companies keeping work in-house; it wins on scale, therapeutic track record and the ability to use its own patient data to find trial sites, not on any structural lock-in. One notable vulnerability sits inside the moat itself: the company's own risk factors flag that data suppliers can restrict how IQVIA uses their data or refuse to license it — the raw material is rented, not owned.

What drives demand

Moderately cyclical

Drug development spending is not consumer spending: a phase III trial already under way is rarely cancelled because the economy turned, and the data licences renew whether or not it is a good year. That gives the revenue a defensive core. The cycle enters from two other doors. The first is biotech funding — small and mid-sized developers, who have no revenue of their own, commission trials out of money raised on capital markets, so when that window closes their bookings and cancellations move quickly, and the company itself lists credit and capital market disruption among its risks. The second is the large pharmaceutical customers' own patent and pipeline cycle: outsourced work follows where their R&D budgets go, and a wave of expiries or a strategic reset in a big client shows up as delayed decisions rather than an immediate revenue drop. The 2025 numbers show what this looks like in practice — the group grew 5.9% with the data and analytics side (up 7.6%) running ahead of clinical research (up 4.3%).

Key risks

  • Most contracts can be cancelled on short notice — The company discloses that most of its contracts may be terminated on short notice, and that it may lose, or suffer delays on, large client contracts. A clinical trial that is stopped for scientific, regulatory or funding reasons takes its remaining backlog with it, so the reported order book can shrink without any loss of competitive position.
  • Data suppliers can restrict or withdraw their data — Among its risk factors the company lists the imposition of restrictions on its use of data by data suppliers, or their refusal to license data to it. Because the information business is assembled from third-party sources rather than generated internally, a change of policy by large suppliers would strike directly at the product.
  • Data protection and privacy law — The company flags any failure to comply with contractual, regulatory or ethical requirements under its contracts, including current or future changes to data protection and privacy laws. It handles patient-level health information across more than 100 jurisdictions, each of which can tighten the rules on what may be collected, combined or re-identified.
  • Security breaches and system failures — Disclosed risks include breaches or misuse of the company's own security and communications systems or those of its outsourcing partners. A serious incident would hit both the trust that underpins the data licences and the clinical trial operations that run on those systems.
  • The market may not grow as expected — The company states that the market for its services may not grow as it expects, that it may be unable to develop and market new services successfully or to enter new markets. Demand rests on pharmaceutical R&D and commercial budgets continuing to be outsourced at the rate assumed.
  • Credit markets and economic conditions — The company discloses that disruptions in the credit and capital markets, together with unfavourable economic conditions, could hurt its business. This cuts two ways: it carried net debt of $13.744 billion at 3.63x trailing adjusted EBITDA at the end of 2025, and a large part of its client base — emerging biotech — funds its trials from those same capital markets.
  • Global operations, currency and acquisitions — Risks disclosed include operating across many countries with the resulting currency exposure, business disruption from natural disasters, pandemics or international conflict, and the difficulty of integrating acquired businesses. Reported growth in 2025 was higher than constant-currency growth in every segment, which shows how much the top line moves with exchange rates.

Customer concentration

Top customers account for 5% of revenue

Concentration is low for a business of this type. The 10-K states that no single client accounted for 10% or more of total company revenues in 2025, 2024 or 2023, and that the largest client represented approximately 5% of total revenues in 2025. The company reports over 10,000 clients and says it serves nearly all of the top 100 global pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. The figure above is the largest single client, not a top-ten total, which the filing does not give. The concentration that matters here is of a different kind: the customer base is one industry, so a downturn in pharmaceutical R&D budgets reaches every account at once even though no single account is large.

The case for

Buyers argue that the company sits on an asset nobody can rebuild: the licensed data estate that defines how drug sales and treatment patterns are counted, feeding a higher-margin information and software business that grew 7.6% in 2025. They point to the combination as the real prize — the same patient data that is sold to commercial teams also tells the clinical research arm where to find trial sites and patients, an advantage a pure CRO or a pure data vendor cannot copy. They note the $32.7 billion contracted backlog, up 5.3%, with roughly $8.3 billion due to convert within twelve months, and read the reacceleration of the fourth quarter (revenue up 10.3%) as the biotech funding drought passing. They add that the customer base is broad — no client above 10% of revenue — that pharmaceutical R&D spending is among the more resilient corporate budgets, and that outsourcing penetration still has room to rise. Some also argue that applying analytics to the group's own data could lift trial productivity, making the clinical business structurally more profitable than the labour-billing model it grew up as.

The case against

Sellers fear that the visible backlog is softer than it looks, because the company itself discloses that most contracts can be terminated on short notice — a cancellation wave among biotech clients whose funding dried up would empty the order book faster than new bookings replace it. They point out that the majority of revenue, the clinical research segment, is a competitive services business that grew 4.3% in 2025, slower than the group, and where price is negotiated trial by trial against other large CROs and against pharma companies choosing to keep work in-house. They worry about the rented foundation of the data business: the company lists among its own risks that data suppliers may restrict its use of their data or refuse to license it, and that data protection and privacy laws may change — a tightening of either in a major market removes product, not just margin. They note net debt of $13.744 billion at 3.63x adjusted EBITDA, which leaves less room if revenue stalls, and that reported growth flattered constant-currency growth in every 2025 segment. Some add that generative AI cuts both ways: if drug developers can generate insight and run analysis on their own data, the value of paying an intermediary for reports and consulting hours falls.

Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 248.4Score: 61Market cap: $13.42B

IQVIA's 10-K names ICON first among its larger CRO rivals: both run full-service global clinical trials for the same biopharma sponsors and both pair them with real-world data and trial technology.

P/E: 36.3Score: 73Market cap: $250.91B

Through its PPD clinical research division — named by IQVIA in both of its segments' competition sections — Thermo Fisher bids for the same full-service drug development and laboratory contracts with large pharmaceutical sponsors.

P/E: 36.6Score: 78Market cap: $17.42B

Medpace runs the same full-service clinical trials but concentrates on small and mid-sized biotech sponsors, the customer segment where it most often takes work away from IQVIA.

P/E: 46.7Score: 82Market cap: $45.33B

Listed among IQVIA's rivals in Technology & Analytics Solutions, Veeva sells the same life-sciences software and commercial data to pharmaceutical customers, and the two have litigated over that overlap.

Parexel International CorporationNot tracked

Named by IQVIA as one of its larger competitors, Parexel is a full-service global CRO chasing the same phase I–IV trial and regulatory consulting budgets; it is privately held, so no ticker applies.

Fortrea Holdings Inc.FTRE

Spun off from Labcorp's drug development arm, Fortrea competes head-on for outsourced late-stage clinical trial contracts from pharmaceutical and biotech sponsors worldwide.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$16.63B

Trailing 12 months (through 3/31/2026)

Net Income

$1.38B

Trailing 12 months (through 3/31/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$2.05B

Total Equity

$6.50B

Total Liabilities

$23.31B

Current Ratio

0.75

Interest Coverage

2.91

Debt/EBITDA

4.83

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

General caseUndervalued

Fair Value

$476.19

Current Price

$268.85

Margin of Safety

+43.5%

Fair Value Range

$309.52 - $642.85

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$279.56
Discounted cash flow (DCF):$891.64
Earnings multiple (P/E):$168.00
Graham growth formula:$413.90
Earnings power value (EPV):$94.31
Justified P/B:$87.88
Dividend discount (Gordon):Not enough data to compute it
P/FFO, funds from operations:$240.05
Mid-cycle earnings:$177.89
Revenue multiple:$399.95
Analyst Consensus:Strong Buy (23B / 5H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:+2.92%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

33.40

ROE

20.9%

P/B Ratio

7.21

P/FCF

21.21

Gross Margin

-

ROIC

8.1%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

8.1%

WACC

9.0%

ROIC − WACC

-0.9 pp

ROIC is roughly in line with the cost of capital — the company is barely covering its capital cost.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (17)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 10.06%
  • Price CAGR 13.16%
  • ROIC 8.1%
  • P/FCF 21.21
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 13.2%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 21.9%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 7.5%
  • Analyst Consensus 82% Buy
  • PEG Ratio 0.80
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.95
  • Share Dilution -5.4%

Failed (9)

  • P/B Ratio 7.21
  • CapEx intensity
  • Current Ratio
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Earnings Surprise avg 1.1%
  • Net Margin Trend 8.3% vs 8.6%
  • Piotroski F-Score 4/9

Unavailable (2)

  • Gross Margin NaN%
  • Dividend Payout NaN%

Piotroski F-Score

4/9

Mixed signals: some areas need attention

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.95

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-5.4%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Ari BousbibCEO & Chairman64
Mr. Eric M. Sherbet J.D.Executive VP, General Counsel & Secretary61
Mr. W. Richard Staub IIIPresident of Research & Development Solutions62
Mr. Alistair GrenfellPresident of Commercial Solutions51
Mr. Michael J. Fedock MBAExecutive VP & Chief Financial Officer49
Mr. James G. BerkshireExecutive Vice President of Global Infrastructure & Operations51
Ms. Keriann CherofskySenior VP, Corporate Controller & Chief Accounting Officer40
Dr. Jeffrey A. Spaeder M.D.Chief Medical & Scientific Officer-
Kerri JosephSenior VP of Investor Relations & Treasurer-
Mr. Duane SachsSenior Vice President of Corporate Development-

Audit Risk

1

Board Risk

6

Compensation Risk

8

Shareholder Rights Risk

7

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-02-17

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-07-28

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-09-23

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for IQV, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for IQV.