Back to rankings

Labcorp Holdings Inc (LH)

Fair Value
HealthcareDiagnostics & ResearchUnited States

Fundamental

66

Price

$308.11

Market Cap

$25.11B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Labcorp Holdings is one of the largest laboratory services companies in the world. It does two things: it runs a network of clinical laboratories that process blood, tissue and genetic tests ordered by doctors, hospitals and patients across the United States and Canada, and it sells laboratory work to drug companies that are developing new medicines. In fiscal 2025 the company reported about 71,000 employees, more than 2,200 patient service centres, clients in roughly 100 countries, and more than 750 million tests performed. The filing states that Labcorp supported over 85% of the new drugs and therapeutics approved by the FDA.

How it makes money

Labcorp is paid per test and per contract. In the diagnostics business the money comes from four different pockets, and the 10-K gives the split of total company revenue: third-party payers such as managed care organisations and health plans 37%, physicians and other institutional clients who pay negotiated rates 23%, patients paying deductibles, coinsurance or consumer tests 10%, and Medicare and Medicaid at government fee schedules 8%. Most of this is fee-for-service, with a smaller capitated component. The drug-development business is contract revenue: pharmaceutical, biotechnology and diagnostics companies pay for preclinical safety work, analytical and manufacturing chemistry, and central laboratory support of clinical trials, and that segment is 22% of company revenue.

Revenue by segment

Diagnostics Laboratories (Dx)78%

Routine and specialty clinical testing, anatomic pathology, genetics and genomics, sold to physicians, hospitals and health systems, health plans and directly to patients through more than 2,200 patient service centres and over 7,000 in-office phlebotomists in the United States and Canada. Revenue was $10,876.5 million in fiscal 2025.

Biopharma Laboratory Services (BLS)22%

Laboratory work sold to pharmaceutical, biotechnology and diagnostics companies: early development research laboratories doing safety assessment, analytical services and manufacturing chemistry, plus central laboratory services supporting clinical trials in roughly 100 countries. Revenue was $3,098.2 million in fiscal 2025.

Competitive moat

Cost advantage · Narrow

A clinical laboratory is a volume business: the fixed cost of automated analysers, logistics and IT is spread over the number of specimens processed, and Labcorp processes more than 750 million tests a year across a national network. That scale, plus over 2,200 collection points and thousands of phlebotomists placed inside physician offices, makes it hard for a small laboratory to match its unit cost or its reach when a health plan negotiates a national contract. The advantage is real but not unassailable: the company's own filing flags increased competition including price competition, customer consolidation, and government fee schedules that set the price of a large slice of its work regardless of how efficient it is.

What drives demand

Moderately cyclical

The two halves of the company behave differently over a cycle. Diagnostic testing is largely non-discretionary — a doctor orders a blood panel because a patient is ill — and the filing points to demographic trends such as the ageing of the U.S. population driving higher utilisation of healthcare services; that part of the business is closer to defensive, though it still depends on people visiting doctors and holding insurance. The drug-development segment, 22% of revenue, follows pharmaceutical and biotechnology research budgets, which expand and contract with the funding environment. The 10-K does not present an explicit statement on cyclicality or seasonality, so this reading comes from the structure of the two segments, not from a company claim.

Key risks

  • Reimbursement and coverage decisions are outside the company's control — The company discloses the risk of changes in government and third-party payer regulations, reimbursement or coverage policies, and of shifts in payer mix or payment structure. A large part of what a test is worth is set by Medicare and Medicaid fee schedules and by managed care contracts, not by Labcorp.
  • Enforcement of anti-fraud and abuse laws — The filing discloses exposure to significant monetary damages and penalties arising from enforcement of healthcare anti-fraud and abuse laws, an ordinary hazard for a company that bills federal health programmes for hundreds of millions of tests.
  • Privacy, security and cyber incidents — The company discloses the risk of fines, penalties and costs from failing to comply with privacy and security laws, and of failures or breaches of its information technology systems. It holds clinical results for a very large number of patients.
  • Loss or suspension of laboratory licences — The filing discloses the risk of losing or having suspended a licence or certification under CLIA or of exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid. A laboratory that loses its certification cannot legally report results.
  • Competition and price pressure — The company discloses increased competition, including price competition, alongside customer retention risk and consolidation among its customers, which strengthens the buyer's hand in negotiations.
  • Acquisitions and integration — The filing discloses the risk of failing to identify, close and effectively integrate acquisitions. Labcorp has grown partly by buying hospital outreach laboratories and other businesses, so this is a recurring exposure rather than a one-off.
  • People, labour relations and collection of receivables — Disclosed risks include the inability to attract, retain and develop qualified personnel, unionisation activity and strikes, and deterioration in days sales outstanding — the last one matters because a growing share of the bill is paid directly by patients.

Customer concentration

The filing does not disclose a figure for the share of revenue taken by its largest customers, and no statement of the usual 'no single customer accounted for more than X%' type was found. What it does give is the payer mix: third-party payers such as health plans 37% of total revenue, physicians and other institutional clients 23%, patients 10%, Medicare and Medicaid 8%, and biopharma customers 22%. On the drug-development side the company describes serving hundreds of pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and diagnostics companies. The concentration that matters here is therefore at the payer level — a handful of large managed care organisations and the federal fee schedules — rather than at the level of any one named customer.

The case for

Buyers argue that laboratory testing is a volume game that the largest player wins: Labcorp processes more than 750 million tests a year, and each additional specimen flowing through an existing analyser and courier route costs little to handle. They point to the company's own account of fiscal 2025 — revenue growth of over 7% with margin expansion and strong free cash flow — and to two engines that can keep feeding it: hospitals and health systems continuing to sell their outreach laboratories to Labcorp, and more than 130 new tests launched in 2025 in oncology, women's health, neurology and autoimmune disease, which carry higher prices than routine panels. They add that the drug-development arm, which the filing says supported over 85% of newly FDA-approved therapeutics, gives exposure to pharmaceutical research without the risk of owning any single molecule.

The case against

Sellers fear that the price of the product is set by someone else. Medicare and Medicaid fee schedules, and the managed care contracts that account for the largest slice of revenue, are renegotiated downward more often than upward, and the company's own risk disclosures list reimbursement policy changes, payer mix shifts and price competition among its main exposures. They note that growth has leaned on acquisitions of hospital outreach laboratories — the filing itself flags the risk of failing to close and integrate them — which makes organic performance harder to read and consumes capital. They also point to the cost side: a laboratory network is labour-heavy, and the company discloses risks around attracting and retaining staff, unionisation and strikes. Finally, they worry about the tail risks that come with holding clinical data and billing federal programmes: a cyber incident, a privacy penalty, an anti-fraud enforcement action or the suspension of a CLIA certification are all disclosed risks whose cost does not scale with the size of the mistake.

Generated on September 19, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$14.35B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$1.00B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$1.21B

Total Equity

$8.62B

Total Liabilities

$9.76B

Current Ratio

1.80

Interest Coverage

6.59

Debt/EBITDA

3.28

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

General caseFairly Valued

Fair Value

$303.83

Current Price

$308.11

Margin of Safety

-1.4%

Fair Value Range

$197.49 - $410.18

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$344.81
Discounted cash flow (DCF):$480.41
Earnings multiple (P/E):$193.75
Graham growth formula:$90.51
Earnings power value (EPV):$153.78
Justified P/B:$147.67
Dividend discount (Gordon):$56.24
P/FFO, funds from operations:$307.29
Mid-cycle earnings:$527.52
Revenue multiple:$689.39
Analyst Consensus:Strong Buy (21B / 6H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:+1.40%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

25.48

ROE

10.2%

P/B Ratio

2.90

P/FCF

21.63

Gross Margin

28.9%

ROIC

7.2%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

7.2%

WACC

7.9%

ROIC − WACC

-0.7 pp

ROIC is roughly in line with the cost of capital — the company is barely covering its capital cost.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (19)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 5.59%
  • Price CAGR 10.94%
  • ROIC 7.2%
  • P/FCF 21.63
  • P/B Ratio 2.90
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 10.4%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 11.6%
  • Analyst Consensus 78% Buy
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.63
  • Share Dilution -0.7%
  • Net Margin Trend 7.0% vs 5.7%
  • Piotroski F-Score 8/9

Failed (7)

  • Gross Margin 28.9%
  • CapEx intensity
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Revenue Growth 5Y -0.0%
  • Earnings Surprise avg 0.2%

Unavailable (2)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)

Piotroski F-Score

8/9

Strong financial health

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.63

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-0.7%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Adam H. SchechterPresident, CEO & Chairman60
Ms. Julia A. WangCFO & Executive VP53
Dr. Brian J. Caveney J.D., M.D., M.P.H.Exec VP, President of Biopharma Laboratory Services & Chief Medical and Scientific Officer51
Mr. Jonathan C. Meltzer Ph.D.EVP & Chief Operations Officer-
Mr. Peter J. WilkinsonSenior VP & Chief Accounting Officer54
Mr. Akinbolade Oyegunwa M.B.A., Ph.D.Executive VP and Chief Information & Technology Officer42
Mr. Dewey Steadman C.F.A.Senior Vice President of Investor Relations-
Ms. Kathryn Wright KyleExecutive VP, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary54
Ms. Amy B. SummyEVP, Chief Marketing Officer & Consumer Health Lead59
Ms. Anita Z. GrahamExecutive VP & Chief Human Resources Officer54

Audit Risk

3

Board Risk

7

Compensation Risk

3

Shareholder Rights Risk

1

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-02-24

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-08-05

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-09-30

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for LH, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 7/30/2026POSITIVE
    Labcorp Raises Earnings Outlook on Strong Medical Testing Demand

    Labcorp Holdings Inc. has elevated its full-year earnings forecast, buoyed by robust second-quarter results that surpassed analyst expectations. The company highlighted significant growth in its cancer testing and novel genetic screening services as key drivers. This positive performance indicates strong demand for Labcorp's diagnostic solutions, suggesting resilience and potential for continued market share gains. Investors may see this as a signal of effective strategic execution and favorable market positioning, potentially leading to a reassessment of the stock's valuation.

via Markets Gazette