Back to rankings

The Clorox Company (CLX)

Undervalued
Consumer DefensiveHousehold & Personal ProductsUnited States

Fundamental

53

Price

$81.01

Market Cap

$9.89B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Clorox makes household staples sold under well-known names: bleach and cleaning sprays under its own Clorox brand, trash bags under Glad, charcoal under Kingsford, and personal-care and health products including Burt's Bees. It manufactures most of what it sells, ships it to large retailers, and relies on repeat, habitual purchases rather than one-off sales — a household restocks bleach or trash bags on a predictable cycle regardless of the wider economy.

How it makes money

Revenue comes from selling packaged goods to a concentrated set of large retailers, who then resell to shoppers. Margins depend on the cost of raw materials such as resin and chemicals, on manufacturing efficiency, and on holding shelf space and brand loyalty against cheaper private-label alternatives that retailers sell alongside Clorox's own products. The company reports results across four segments split by product category and by U.S. versus international markets.

Revenue by segment

Health and Wellness38.1%

Cleaning and disinfecting products under Clorox, plus water filtration under Brita and vitamins under Natural Vitality.

Household28.3%

Trash bags under Glad, cat litter under Fresh Step and Scoop Away, and charcoal under Kingsford.

Lifestyle18.4%

Food products including Hidden Valley dressings, and personal care through Burt's Bees.

International15.1%

The same core product categories sold outside the United States, mainly in Latin America and Canada.

Competitive moat

Brand · Narrow

Names like Clorox, Glad and Kingsford have been the default choice on U.S. shelves for generations, which lets the company hold shelf space and charge more than an unbranded equivalent. The advantage is narrow: retailer store brands compete directly in nearly every category, and a large retailer with real pricing leverage can push back hard on Clorox's terms.

What drives demand

Defensive

Cleaning products, trash bags and personal care items are routine, non-discretionary household purchases that people keep buying in a downturn, which makes volume relatively stable across the economic cycle. The bigger swings in results tend to come from input-cost inflation and from consumers trading down to private label when money is tight, not from skipping the purchase altogether.

Key risks

  • Retailer concentration — With Walmart alone worth nearly 27% of net sales, large retailers have the leverage to demand better pricing terms or to favour their own private-label products over Clorox's brands.
  • Input cost and supply chain disruption — Volatile commodity, packaging, labour, energy and logistics costs, along with the risk of supply disruption from conflicts such as those in Ukraine, the Middle East, or tensions between China and Taiwan, can raise costs faster than prices can be adjusted.
  • Cybersecurity — The company depends heavily on information technology systems and has already suffered a major cyberattack, in August 2023, that disrupted operations; a repeat incident could again halt production and shipments.
  • Private-label competition — Store-brand alternatives, often priced well below Clorox's products, compete in nearly every category the company sells in, forcing continued spending on marketing and innovation to defend market share.

Customer concentration

Top customers account for 27% of revenue

Walmart and its affiliates accounted for nearly 27% of net sales in fiscal 2025, giving a single retailer significant leverage over shelf placement, promotional terms and pricing.

The case for

Buyers argue that Clorox's brands are habit-forming staples that hold shelf space no private label can fully dislodge, and that the company's cost-savings programme and full recovery from the 2023 cyberattack position it to grow margins even on roughly flat sales.

The case against

Sellers worry that with Walmart alone worth over a quarter of sales, Clorox has limited room to push back on retailer demands, and that persistent private-label competition plus input-cost inflation could keep squeezing volumes and margins at the same time.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 1127.5Score: 52Market cap: $3.12T

Reckitt's Lysol is the closest rival to Clorox's core disinfecting bleach, sprays and wipes, fighting for the same shelf space and the same household and professional cleaning budgets in North America.

P/E: 30.3Score: 71Market cap: $22.68B

Church & Dwight sells Arm & Hammer cleaning and laundry additives, cat litter and personal care to the same value-minded U.S. grocery and mass-market shopper Clorox depends on.

P/E: 21.9Score: 60Market cap: $346.41B

P&G's Mr. Clean, Swiffer, Dawn and Febreze compete directly with Clorox's home-cleaning lines for the same retail shelf and promotional slots, backed by far larger advertising and R&D budgets.

P/E: 33.7Score: 61Market cap: $68.97B

Colgate-Palmolive's home-care brands — Fabuloso, Ajax, Murphy Oil Soap — target the same surface-cleaning customer in the United States and in Clorox's Latin American markets.

S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc.Not tracked

This privately held U.S. group competes across several Clorox aisles at once: Windex and Scrubbing Bubbles against Clorox cleaners, Ziploc against Glad bags and wraps, Glade against home fragrance.

Unilever PLCNot tracked

Unilever competes with Clorox on two fronts: Domestos and Cif bleach and surface cleaners outside the U.S., and Dove, Vaseline and Simple against Burt's Bees in natural personal care.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$6.76B

Trailing 12 months (through 3/31/2026)

Net Income

$756M

Trailing 12 months (through 3/31/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$761M

Total Equity

$321M

Total Liabilities

$5.08B

Current Ratio

0.84

Interest Coverage

-

Debt/EBITDA

3.94

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

General caseUndervalued

Fair Value

$108.06

Current Price

$81.01

Margin of Safety

+25.0%

Fair Value Range

$70.24 - $145.88

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$100.76
Discounted cash flow (DCF):$193.39
Earnings multiple (P/E):$71.12
Graham growth formula:$35.98
Earnings power value (EPV):$64.12
Justified P/B:$16.85
Dividend discount (Gordon):Not enough data to compute it
P/FFO, funds from operations:$136.15
Mid-cycle earnings:Not enough data to compute it
Revenue multiple:$65.36
Analyst Consensus:Hold (1B / 17H / 9S)
Last Earnings Surprise:-0.49%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

13.15

ROE

252.3%

P/B Ratio

30.81

P/FCF

25.78

Gross Margin

43.8%

ROIC

-

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

-

WACC

6.0%

ROIC − WACC

-

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (12)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • Gross Margin 43.8%
  • P/FCF 25.78
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 181.1%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 0.76
  • Share Dilution -0.2%
  • Net Margin Trend 11.2% vs 9.9%
  • Piotroski F-Score 8/9

Failed (11)

  • EPS CAGR 4.22%
  • Price CAGR -3.51%
  • P/B Ratio 30.81
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • CapEx intensity
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Fairly valued)
  • Revenue Growth 5Y -1.8%
  • Analyst Consensus 4% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 1.8%

Unavailable (5)

  • ROIC NaN%
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Operating Margin NaN%
  • Interest Coverage
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)

Piotroski F-Score

8/9

Strong financial health

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

0.76

Moderate: some gap between profits and cash

Share Dilution

-0.2%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Ms. Linda J. RendleCEO & Chairman47
Mr. Luc BelletExecutive VP & CFO46
Mr. Chris T. HyderExecutive VP & COO50
Ms. Nina BartonExecutive VP and Chief Growth & Strategy Officer51
Ms. Laura E. PeckVP, Chief Accounting Officer & Corporate Controller48
Ms. Chau BanksSenior VP and Chief Information & Data Officer56
Ms. Kirsten M. MarrinerExecutive VP & Chief Administrative Officer52
Ms. Lisah BurhanVice President of Investor Relations-
Ms. Angela C. HiltExecutive VP, Chief Legal & External Affairs Officer and Corporate Secretary53
Mr. Eric Sean SchwartzSenior VP & Chief Marketing Officer53

Audit Risk

7

Board Risk

3

Compensation Risk

6

Shareholder Rights Risk

8

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-08-07

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-04-30

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-08-03

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for CLX, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 8/3/2026POSITIVE
    Clorox Expects Full-Year Sales Boost From Purell Deal

    The Clorox Company announced fiscal fourth-quarter earnings that surpassed analyst forecasts, signaling resilience despite challenges. While sales volumes were down and the recent acquisition of GOJO Industries, the maker of Purell, incurred additional logistics costs, the overall financial performance indicates effective management. The company anticipates a full-year sales boost stemming from the Purell integration, suggesting a positive outlook for future revenue streams. Investors will be watching the successful integration of GOJO and its impact on Clorox's market position and profitability in the coming quarters.

via Markets Gazette