Cathay General Bancorp (CATY)
Fair ValueFundamental
73
Price
$58.39
Market Cap
$3.97B
Part 1 · What the company is worth
Overview
Cathay General Bancorp is the holding company of Cathay Bank, a California state-chartered commercial bank founded to serve Chinese-American communities and today lending to individuals, professionals and small-to-medium-sized businesses. At December 31, 2025 it ran 61 branches — 24 in Southern California, 17 in Northern California, 9 in New York and the rest in Washington, Illinois, Texas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada and New Jersey — plus a Hong Kong branch and representative offices in Beijing, Shanghai and Taipei. Staff speak English, Chinese dialects and Vietnamese, which is how the bank reaches a clientele other regional lenders find hard to serve. Total assets were $24.23 billion, net loans $19.94 billion and deposits $20.89 billion; 2025 net income was $315.1 million ($4.54 per diluted share).
How it makes money
Like most regional banks, Cathay earns most of its money from the spread between what it charges on loans and what it pays on deposits. In 2025 net interest income was $742.5 million, up 10.1% from $674.1 million in 2024, with a net interest margin of 3.30% against 3.04% in 2024; fee and other income added just $75.4 million. Funding comes almost entirely from customer deposits — average interest-bearing deposits were 98.3% of average interest-bearing liabilities — so the cost of time deposits, money-market and savings accounts drives profitability as much as loan yields do. The loan book is the engine: gross loans were 52.4% commercial real estate, 29.0% residential mortgage and 15.8% commercial at year-end 2025. Fee income is a mix of depository service charges, letters of credit commissions, wire and safe-deposit fees, wealth-management and foreign-exchange fees, gains on loan sales and marks on equity securities — the last of which makes the line lumpy: the 35.5% jump in 2025 came largely from a $14.9 million unrealised gain on equity securities. The bank also invests in affordable-housing and renewable-energy partnerships, which lower the tax bill: the effective tax rate was 19.2% in 2025 and 9.9% in 2024.
Competitive moat
No identified moat · NoneThe 10-K describes a community franchise, not a structural advantage. Cathay concentrates on markets with a high density of Chinese-American individuals and businesses, staffs its branches with Mandarin, Cantonese and Vietnamese speakers and maintains a Hong Kong branch and offices in Beijing, Shanghai and Taipei — a relationship network that is genuinely hard for a generic competitor to copy branch by branch, and which management itself frames as the reason it can underwrite credit in these niches. But the product is money: the bank competes for the same commercial-real-estate borrowers and the same deposits as everyone else, has no pricing power over either, and its own filing calls this focus a concentration of risk rather than a protection. A 3.30% net interest margin and a 10.87% return on average equity in 2025 are respectable regional-bank numbers, not evidence of a durable edge.
What drives demand
CyclicalDemand for what Cathay sells moves with the credit cycle and with the price of money. Loan growth depends on small and mid-sized businesses borrowing and on commercial-property owners buying, building and refinancing; when rates rise or California property values wobble, both stop, and the same downturn that slows new lending also raises losses on the old book. The margin is rate-driven too: the 2025 improvement to 3.30% came mainly from cheaper time deposits rather than from better loan yields. Deposits behave cyclically in their own way — in 2025 money-market balances grew 12.7% and savings 19.8% as customers chased yield, which is the kind of mix shift that squeezes a bank's funding cost. Fee income is too small (roughly a tenth of net interest income) to steady the result, and part of it is equity-market marks, which makes it a swing factor rather than a cushion.
Key risks
- The loan book is largely secured by real estate — The company states that its loan portfolio is largely secured by real estate and that a downturn in the real-estate market may adversely affect results. Commercial real estate alone was 52.4% of gross loans at December 31, 2025, and residential mortgages a further 29.0%.
- Geographic and asset-class concentration — Cathay lists 'Concentration of risk increases the potential for significant losses' among its material risks. It operates mainly in California markets with a concentration of Chinese-American individuals and businesses, and says this leaves it exposed to a focused downturn: deterioration in California economic, housing or real-estate conditions would raise credit losses disproportionately. It also warns that regulators scrutinise banks with high commercial-real-estate exposure and may require more capital than would otherwise be expected.
- Interest-rate risk — The company discloses that its business is subject to interest-rate risk and that fluctuations in rates could reduce net interest income. It also lists inflation and deflation as factors that may adversely affect financial performance.
- Credit losses may exceed the allowance — Two separate risk factors cover this: the company may have to make additional provisions and charge off further loans, and the allowance for credit losses is only an estimate of expected losses — actual losses above that estimate would hit results and capital.
- Liquidity and the soundness of other banks — The filing warns that liquidity risk could impair the ability to fund operations and jeopardise financial condition, and separately that the soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect Cathay. It also flags that a goodwill impairment would produce a charge against earnings and reduce stockholders' equity.
- Exposure to conditions in Asia — Among its market and economic risks the company lists that adverse conditions in Asia and elsewhere could adversely affect the business — consistent with a franchise that has a Hong Kong branch, representative offices in Beijing, Shanghai and Taipei, and loan clients in Hong Kong.
- Information systems, third parties and regulation — Operational risk factors include failures, interruptions or security breaches of information systems; increasing regulatory attention on the use of third-party vendors; failure to comply with the Community Reinvestment Act and fair-lending laws, which could lead to material penalties; and changes in accounting standards or tax laws. The company also notes that returns on its tax-advantaged affordable-housing and alternative-energy investments may not materialise as anticipated.
Customer concentration
The filing does not disclose a top-customer percentage, and states that the Company has no specific industry concentration and that there were no loan concentrations to multiple borrowers in similar activities exceeding 10% of total loans as of December 31, 2025 or 2024. The concentration that matters here is geographic and by asset class, not by counterparty: most business is with clients in high-density Asian-populated areas of Southern and Northern California, New York City, Dallas and Houston, Seattle, Boston, Chicago, Nevada, New Jersey and Rockville, Maryland, plus loan clients in Hong Kong, and about 47.9% of the Bank's residential mortgages were on properties located in California.
The case for
Buyers argue that 2025 showed the funding squeeze reversing: net interest income rose 10.1% to $742.5 million, the margin widened from 3.04% to 3.30% as expensive time deposits repriced downward, and net income recovered to $315.1 million from $286.0 million. They point to a cost base that few regional banks match — an efficiency ratio of 43.41%, down from 51.35% — meaning most of any further revenue gain drops through to earnings. They note the balance sheet grew on both sides in 2025, deposits up 6.1% to $20.89 billion and net loans up $732.7 million, so the franchise is still taking in funding rather than defending it. And they argue the community niche is the reason: a branch network staffed in Chinese dialects and Vietnamese, with a Hong Kong branch and mainland representative offices, gathers deposits and finds borrowers that larger banks reach less easily. Capital returns are visible too — $180.3 million of stock repurchased and $93.8 million of dividends paid in 2025, against a return on average equity of 10.87%.
The case against
Sellers fear a balance sheet built on one asset class in one state. Commercial real estate is 52.4% of gross loans, residential mortgages another 29.0%, and roughly 47.9% of those mortgages sit on California property — so a single regional property downturn hits collateral values, new lending and credit losses at once, exactly the scenario the company's own risk factors describe. They note that provisions for credit losses rose in 2025 and that the allowance is an estimate management admits may fall short. They worry about the deposit franchise: non-interest-bearing accounts are a minority of a $20.89 billion book, and 2025's growth came disproportionately from money-market (+12.7%) and savings (+19.8%) balances — rate-sensitive money that leaves when someone pays more, which means the margin recovery reverses if rates or competition move the wrong way. They also point out that earnings quality flatters the picture: the 35.5% rise in fee income leaned on a $14.9 million unrealised equity gain, and the effective tax rate of 19.2% depends on affordable-housing and alternative-energy investments whose returns the company says may not materialise. Finally there is no structural protection — the bank competes on price for both loans and deposits, and its filing flags that regulators may demand more capital precisely because of its commercial-real-estate concentration.
Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users
The larger Chinese-American bank Cathay's own 10-K points to, chasing the same commercial real estate and small-business borrowers and the same deposits in Chinese-American communities in California, New York and across the Pacific.
A Los Angeles bank serving Chinese-American entrepreneurs and mid-sized businesses, bidding for the same commercial real estate loans in Southern California with an almost identical branch footprint.
Another Los Angeles-based Chinese-American bank lending to small and mid-market businesses in the same California, New York, Illinois and Nevada markets Cathay serves.
The largest Korean-American bank, competing branch by branch in Los Angeles, New York and Texas for the same immigrant-owned small businesses, SBA loans and commercial property financing.
A Los Angeles Asian-American commercial bank going after the same small-business deposits and SBA and commercial real estate lending in California, Illinois, Texas and New York.
Balance Sheet & Liquidity
Revenue
$871M
Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)
Net Income
$347M
Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)
Free Cash Flow
$364M
Total Equity
$2.93B
Total Liabilities
$21.30B
Current Ratio
-
Interest Coverage
0.56
Debt/EBITDA
-
Earnings Per Share
Revenue & Net Income
Free Cash Flow
Income Breakdown
Historical statement
Margins over time
Debt over time
Growth grid
Growth — Revenue
Fair Value Estimation
Fair Value
$54.62
Current Price
$58.39
Margin of Safety
-6.9%
Fair Value Range
$41.09 - $68.15
Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.
Estimation Methods
Valuation Metrics
P/E Ratio
11.62
ROE
10.8%
P/B Ratio
1.30
P/FCF
7.43
Gross Margin
-
ROIC
-
Profitability Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
-
WACC
9.8%
ROIC − WACC
-
Fundamental Analysis Criteria
Passed (15)
- EPS shows upward trend
- P/FCF 7.43
- P/B Ratio 1.30
- Operating Margin 50.1%
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- CapEx intensity
- Low reliance on intangibles
- Price below Graham Number
- ROE 11.7%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 8.1%
- Earnings Surprise avg 9.2%
- PEG Ratio 1.20
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.56
- Share Dilution -4.1%
- Piotroski F-Score 6/9
Failed (7)
- Price CAGR 4.75%
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Interest Coverage
- Return on Tangible Assets
- DCF valuation (Fairly valued)
- Analyst Consensus 10% Buy
- Net Margin Trend 38.5% vs 39.2%
Unavailable (5)
- ROIC NaN%
- Gross Margin NaN%
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Current Ratio
- Debt/EBITDA
Piotroski F-Score
Mixed signals: some areas need attention
Earnings Quality
High quality: earnings backed by cash
Share Dilution
Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly
Institutional Holdings
Governance
Executive Team
| Name | Title | Age |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Dunson K. Cheng Ph.D. | Executive Chairman of the Board | 80 |
| Mr. Chang Ming Liu | CEO, President & Director | 58 |
| Ms. Diana G. Deen | Executive VP & Chief Risk Officer of Cathy Bank | 62 |
| Mr. Albert Sun | Executive VP & Chief Credit Officer at Cathay Bank | 69 |
| Mr. Albert J. Wang CPA | Executive VP, CFO & Treasurer | 50 |
| Ms. Georgia Lo | Assistant Secretary & Investor Relations | - |
| Ms. May K. Chan | Senior VP, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary & Sustainability Officer | 47 |
Audit Risk
6
Board Risk
4
Compensation Risk
2
Shareholder Rights Risk
5
Part 2 · The price and when to enter
This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.
Documents
- View document
Annual Report (10-K)
A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.
Filed on 2026-03-02
- View document
Quarterly Report (10-Q)
A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.
Filed on 2026-08-07
- View document
Current Report (8-K)
An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.
Filed on 2026-07-22
via SEC EDGAR
Income History
via SEC EDGAR
Latest News
Recent headlines for CATY, sourced from Markets Gazette.
- 3/9/2026NEGATIVEEVP Dumps One-Third of His CATY Shares for $50,200
A key executive at Catalent Inc. has divested a significant portion of their holdings, selling one-third of their shares for approximately $50,200. This transaction follows a pattern of stake reductions by other high-ranking officials within the regional bank. While the sale amount is relatively small, the consistent insider selling can signal a lack of confidence in the company's future prospects among those with the most intimate knowledge of its operations. Investors often interpret such moves as a bearish indicator, potentially impacting the stock's short-term performance.
via Markets Gazette