Banner Corporation (BANR)
Fair ValueFundamental
72
Price
$67.00
Market Cap
$2.28B
Part 1 · What the company is worth
Overview
Banner Corporation is the Washington-based holding company of Banner Bank, a state-chartered commercial bank headquartered in Walla Walla, Washington. At December 31, 2025 it operated 135 branch offices and 15 loan production offices across Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Utah and Nevada, with $16.35 billion of total assets, $11.56 billion of net loans, $13.74 billion of deposits and $1.95 billion of shareholders' equity. The company describes itself as a 'super community bank': it aims to combine the product breadth of a regional bank with the responsiveness and service of a community bank, serving individuals, small and medium-sized businesses, farmers and public sector entities in its six-state footprint. Lending is directed mainly at commercial real estate, multifamily, construction and land development, commercial and small business, and agricultural borrowers, alongside residential mortgages and home equity lines.
How it makes money
Banner earns money the way a traditional bank does: it gathers deposits and other funding at one price and lends or invests the money at a higher one, keeping the spread. In 2025 total interest income was $805.0 million and interest expense $217.0 million, leaving net interest income of $587.9 million — by far the dominant source of revenue. Fee income added $72.8 million of non-interest income, made up mostly of deposit fees and service charges, debit and credit card interchange, and the results of mortgage banking operations, where single-family loans are largely originated for sale into the secondary market rather than held. Against that revenue the company ran $408.8 million of non-interest expense and a $13.0 million provision for credit losses, ending 2025 with $195.4 million of net income. Because the balance sheet is the product, earnings depend on the level of interest rates, on how much of the deposit base has to be repriced, and on whether borrowers repay.
Competitive moat
Switching costs · NarrowBanner's advantage, such as it is, sits in its deposit base rather than in its loans. A $13.74 billion pool of checking and savings relationships built over 135 branches in small and mid-sized western markets moves slowly: households and small businesses rarely change their operating bank over a few basis points, because payroll, card processing and payment arrangements travel with the account. That gives Banner funding that reprices more slowly than wholesale money. The advantage is narrow, not wide. Loans themselves are close to a commodity — a commercial borrower can refinance with another bank or a credit union — and the 2023 regional bank failures showed that deposit stickiness holds only as long as confidence does. At $16.35 billion of assets Banner also lacks the technology and compliance scale of the national banks it competes with.
What drives demand
CyclicalDemand for Banner's product is demand for credit, and that follows the regional economic cycle closely. Loan growth comes when businesses expand, when developers start projects and when houses change hands; all three stop at roughly the same time in a downturn. The construction, land development and commercial real estate exposure amplifies the cycle, because these loans are drawn down during good times and turn into problems exactly when property values fall. Earnings have a second cyclical driver that is independent of the economy: the interest rate cycle, which sets both the yield on the loan book and what depositors demand to stay. Mortgage banking fee income swings with refinancing waves. What is defensive is the deposit franchise — people keep their current account through a recession — but the profitability of that franchise does not.
Key risks
- Concentration in a few western regional economies — The company discloses that adverse economic conditions in its market areas — Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Utah and Nevada — could hurt it more than a geographically diversified bank, because borrowers, collateral and deposits are all drawn from the same regional economies.
- Interest rate changes and volatility — Banner lists changes in the level and shape of interest rates among its principal risks. Rates move the yield on loans and securities and the cost of deposits at different speeds, so the spread that produces almost all of its revenue can compress without anything changing in the underlying business.
- Credit losses and real estate values — The filing cites credit risk, loan delinquencies and declines in real estate values. Banner's portfolio is weighted towards commercial real estate, multifamily, and construction and land development lending — categories whose recovery depends directly on collateral values and on projects reaching completion and lease-up.
- Access to funding and the cost of deposits — The company discloses risk around its ability to access funding sources and control funding costs, and separately around the effects of failures or problems at other banks. Deposits can leave quickly, and replacing them with borrowings is more expensive.
- Information systems, cyber risk and technological change — Among the disclosed risk factors are vulnerabilities in the company's information systems and the need to keep adapting to new technology. A bank of this size carries the same security and modernisation burden as much larger institutions, over a much smaller revenue base.
- Legislation, regulation and examination outcomes — The filing flags legislative and regulatory change, the results of regulatory examinations, and changes in accounting policies and critical estimates. A supervisory finding can restrict what the bank is allowed to do, and a change in accounting estimates can move reported earnings without any cash changing hands.
- Acquisitions and integration — Banner discloses the risk that acquisitions may be harder to integrate than expected. The bank has grown partly by buying other institutions, and integration failures show up as lost customers, unplanned costs and, in the worst case, goodwill impairment.
- Climate events and natural disasters — The company lists climate-related risk and natural disasters among its risk factors. Wildfire, drought and earthquake exposure in the Pacific Northwest and California can damage collateral and, in the agricultural book, the borrower's ability to repay in the same season.
Customer concentration
The filing does not disclose a share of revenue or deposits attributable to a small number of customers, and for a retail and small business bank with roughly 1,930 employees and 135 branches that is the expected answer: revenue comes from a very large number of individual loans and accounts. The concentration that does matter here is of a different kind, and the company discloses it: exposure is concentrated in six western states and, within the loan book, in commercial real estate, multifamily and construction and land development lending, where a single property market turning can affect many borrowers at once. A beginner should read 'customer concentration' for a bank as sector and geography concentration rather than as a top-customer list.
The case for
Buyers argue that Banner is a plainly run deposit-funded bank rather than a leveraged bet. They point to a large, granular deposit base — $13.74 billion against $11.56 billion of net loans, so lending is funded by customers rather than by borrowed money — and to $1.95 billion of equity behind a $16.35 billion balance sheet. They note that 2025 produced $195.4 million of net income on $587.9 million of net interest income with only a $13.0 million provision for credit losses, which they read as a portfolio behaving normally rather than deteriorating. They see the six-state western footprint as growth markets where a mid-sized bank can still win small and mid-sized business relationships that national banks handle impersonally, and they value the fact that single-family mortgages are largely sold rather than warehoused, keeping that risk off the balance sheet. Some also argue that a bank of this size is a plausible acquirer or acquisition candidate as the regional banking sector consolidates.
The case against
Sellers fear that almost everything that determines the result is outside management's control. Net interest income of $587.9 million against only $72.8 million of fee income means there is little to cushion a squeeze between loan yields and deposit costs, and the company itself lists interest rate changes, funding access and funding costs among its risk factors. They point at the composition of the loan book: commercial real estate and multifamily balances of roughly $3.7 billion, plus about $1.7 billion of construction and land development lending, in an environment where office and development values remain contested — and note that a $160 million allowance is what stands between those loans and earnings if values move. They see the geography as a concentration rather than a franchise, with borrowers, collateral and depositors all drawn from the same western economies, exposed to the same wildfire, drought and earthquake risk the filing discloses. They also observe that a $16.35 billion bank carries the technology and compliance costs of modern banking without the scale of a national competitor, and that the 2023 regional bank episode showed how fast a deposit base can be tested.
Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users
Columbia's bank operates across the same Washington, Oregon, Idaho and California markets as Banner and chases the same small and mid-sized business borrowers and core deposits along the I-5 corridor.
The Seattle-based bank overlaps with Banner in Washington, Oregon, Idaho and California and competes for the same residential, construction and commercial real estate lending and retail deposits.
First Interstate Bank serves the same inland Northwest and Oregon communities as Banner, competing for commercial, agricultural and consumer banking customers in overlapping markets.
Heritage Bank is a Washington-based commercial bank of similar community-bank character competing branch by branch with Banner for business banking relationships and deposits in Puget Sound and Oregon.
Through its Wheatland Bank and Mountain West Bank divisions Glacier competes head-on with Banner in eastern Washington and Idaho, including agricultural and small business lending.
Balance Sheet & Liquidity
Revenue
$632M
Fiscal year ended 12/31/2025
Net Income
$195M
Fiscal year ended 12/31/2025
Free Cash Flow
$248M
Total Equity
$1.95B
Total Liabilities
$14.41B
Current Ratio
-
Interest Coverage
0.12
Debt/EBITDA
-
Earnings Per Share
Revenue & Net Income
Free Cash Flow
Income Breakdown
No income data available
Historical statement
Margins over time
Debt over time
How heavy the debt is
Growth grid
Growth — Revenue
Fair Value Estimation
Fair Value
$67.70
Current Price
$67.00
Margin of Safety
+1.0%
Fair Value Range
$54.79 - $80.61
Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.
Estimation Methods
Valuation Metrics
P/E Ratio
11.88
ROE
10.0%
P/B Ratio
1.14
P/FCF
7.98
Gross Margin
-
ROIC
-
Profitability Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
-
WACC
10.2%
ROIC − WACC
-
Fundamental Analysis Criteria
Passed (15)
- EPS shows upward trend
- P/FCF 7.98
- P/B Ratio 1.14
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- CapEx intensity
- Low reliance on intangibles
- Price below Graham Number
- ROE 10.7%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 6.8%
- Analyst Consensus 62% Buy
- Earnings Surprise avg 5.2%
- PEG Ratio 1.02
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.41
- Share Dilution 0.1%
- Piotroski F-Score 6/9
Failed (5)
- Price CAGR 2.01%
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Interest Coverage
- Return on Tangible Assets
- DCF valuation (Fairly valued)
Unavailable (7)
- ROIC NaN%
- Gross Margin NaN%
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Operating Margin NaN%
- Current Ratio
- Debt/EBITDA
- Net Margin Trend (invalid data)
Piotroski F-Score
Mixed signals: some areas need attention
Earnings Quality
High quality: earnings backed by cash
Share Dilution
Share count is stable
Institutional Holdings
Governance
Executive Team
| Name | Title | Age |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Mark J. Grescovich | President, CEO & Director | 61 |
| Mr. Robert G. Butterfield | Executive VP, CFO & Treasurer | 56 |
| Ms. Cynthia D. Purcell | Executive VP and Chief Strategy & Administration Officer of Banner Bank | 68 |
| Mr. James M. Costa | Executive VP & COO of Banner Bank | 56 |
| Mr. Mark Charles Borrecco | EVP & Chief Banking Officer | 53 |
| Ms. Janet M. Brown | Executive VP & Chief Information Officer | 57 |
| Mr. Rich Arnold | Head of Investor Relations | - |
| Ms. Sherrey L. Luetjen | Executive VP, General Counsel, Ethics Officer & Secretary | 53 |
| Ms. Kayleen R. Kohler | Executive Vice President of Human Resources | 52 |
| Ms. Jill M. Rice | Executive VP & Chief Credit Officer | 59 |
Audit Risk
2
Board Risk
2
Compensation Risk
1
Shareholder Rights Risk
4
Part 2 · The price and when to enter
This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.
Documents
- View document
Annual Report (10-K)
A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.
Filed on 2026-02-25
- View document
Quarterly Report (10-Q)
A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.
Filed on 2026-08-04
- View document
Current Report (8-K)
An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.
Filed on 2026-09-01
via SEC EDGAR
Income History
via SEC EDGAR
Latest News
Recent headlines for BANR, sourced from Markets Gazette.